The good news is that the world has stopped responding breathlessly to Donald Trump\u2019s every empty provocation. That\u2019s also the bad news.<\/p>\n
This is an edition of The<\/i> Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. <\/i><\/small>Sign up for it here.<\/small><\/i><\/a> More From The Atlantic<\/em><\/b>
One of Donald Trump\u2019s current favorite riffs is to contrast how (in his opinion) the United States was seen under his predecessor, Joe Biden, and how it\u2019s seen now.
\u201cThey didn\u2019t respect us two years ago. They laughed at us. NATO laughed at us. Everybody laughed at us,\u201d Trump said at a summit in Turkey with allies last month<\/a>. \u201cThey don\u2019t laugh anymore. There\u2019s no more laughing.\u201d
He\u2019s right. It\u2019s worse than laughing\u2014they\u2019re ignoring the president of the United States altogether. Trump styles himself<\/a> as an heir to Theodore Roosevelt, but where Roosevelt said that America should speak softly and carry a big stick, Trump speaks loudly and carries a small one. Roosevelt\u2019s bully pulpit has been reduced to a bullshit pulpit.
This week, Trump made two announcements that, in the past, would have shaken the globe. Speaking to Fox News\u2019s Trey Yingst about negotiations with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said<\/a>, \u201cIf Oman gets in the way, we\u2019ll bomb the shit out of them.\u201d In an ordinary world, such a threat would be a huge news event. Oman is not a hostile nation: It is one of the oldest U.S. allies in the Gulf region and has been a key intermediary in negotiations<\/a> with Iran for years.
Yet the news drew little governmental response. Neither Oman nor other U.S. allies in the region issued official comments<\/a> or took any other action that suggested that they found the threat realistic. One possible reason for their muted response is that Trump has actually made this threat before: He said in May that if Oman didn\u2019t cooperate with Americans\u2019 plans for the strait, \u201cwe\u2019ll have to blow them up.\u201d
Trump\u2019s credibility has been undercut by his own capriciousness. Back then, he was threatening Oman over any negotiations that would imperil the neutrality of the Strait of Hormuz. On Tuesday, however, he posted a graphic on Truth Social<\/a> that declared the strait a \u201cNEW U.S. Territory.\u201d (He\u2019d previously said that he would soon declare it U.S. territory.) American annexation of an international waterway would represent a major shift in maritime legal precedent and require an enormous U.S.-military presence, but everyone knew that the pronouncement was nonsense. Trump has no means of controlling the strait, and The Washington Post <\/i>reports that the Defense Department is actually considering a reduced regional footprint<\/a>. Trump has also repeatedly promised that a deal with Iran is near completion, but after multiple false starts, these announcements fool only the markets<\/a>.
This is a big shift. During his first term, Trump garnered outsize attention for outrageous statements. In August 2017, for example, he created an international incident by threatening North Korea with \u201cfire, fury, and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before.\u201d Trump clearly delighted in how the press and global leaders would scramble to respond to these provocations, and some people argued that he was pursuing Richard Nixon\u2019s \u201cmadman theory\u201d<\/a> of keeping adversaries off balance. One can draw a direct connection between the fire-and-fury threat in 2017 and Trump\u2019s friendly statements about North Korea\u2019s Kim Jong Un in the past week. But over time, the world has grown jaundiced about Trump\u2019s threats.
The good news is that few world leaders and observers feel the need to take Trump\u2019s outbursts seriously anymore. Fire drills driven by Trump\u2019s idle talk fatigue the media, the public, and geopolitical systems, and they distract from more important stories. But that\u2019s also the bad news. First, some of the things that Trump says are very dangerous. His favoritism toward North Korea could destabilize the region and encourage South Korea and Japan\u2014to say nothing of Iran and other rogue states\u2014to pursue nuclear-weapons programs. Second, he does occasionally follow through; Venezuela\u2019s Nicol\u00e1s Maduro may have thought that Trump was bluffing<\/a> before he was arrested during an American incursion in January.
Third, Trump needs credibility to enact his agenda, including to try to end the quagmire in Iran. On Wednesday, he said that he was \u201cannouncing the MOST CRUSHING ECONOMIC OPERATION EVER TAKEN AGAINST ANY COUNTRY!\u201d All-caps notwithstanding, this declaration didn\u2019t receive a great deal of attention. (\u201cThey have no clear plan, unfortunately,\u201d one Middle Eastern diplomat told NOTUS<\/i><\/a>.) In order for the sanctions regime he envisions to have its greatest effect, Trump will need the cooperation<\/a> of allies as well as rival powers such as China. But years of empty boasts and months of feints on Iran mean that other world leaders don\u2019t really heed Trump\u2019s statements. He\u2019s failed to enlist key allies in the war effort, and China has declined to take any concrete action in the strait, despite Trump traveling to Beijing in May to pressure Xi Jinping.
This diminished respect given to presidential statements is self-evidently bad for Trump, and it does nothing to make America great again. But it\u2019s also bad for the world. Even now, no other country has the power the U.S. has to maintain order, and the closest challengers, Russia and China, pursue systems that are repressive and dangerous. The U.S. can regain credibility only by using its rhetoric more carefully and matching its actions to its words\u2014two things that are unlikely to happen under Trump. If he wants to be believed, the president needs to either surrender some American influence or show that his threats are real, and neither option is appealing. The costs of not being taken seriously are very serious indeed.
Related:<\/b>
Here are three new stories from The Atlantic<\/i>:<\/strong>
Today\u2019s News<\/strong>
Evening Read<\/strong>
Why Is Everyone in Silicon Valley Talking Like That?
By Lila Shroff<\/i>
Silicon Valley has long had its own dialect. Venture capitalists are always talking about the value of being \u201chigh agency\u201d and making \u201corthogonal bets.\u201d But lately, tech vernacular has taken a peculiar turn\u2014people have started describing themselves as if they were chatbots. If you misspeak, maybe you\u2019re \u201challucinating<\/a>.\u201d Don\u2019t know the answer to a question? That\u2019s because it\u2019s not in your \u201ctraining data.\u201d Feeling forgetful? Perhaps you have a case of \u201ccontext rot<\/a>,\u201d a phrase that refers to the degradation of a bot\u2019s responses over a long conversation. \u201cI\u2019ve been telling my wife I have context rot for months,\u201d Conor Bronsdon, the host of an AI-focused podcast, told me.
Where I live, in San Francisco, such comparisons are inescapable. \u201cI\u2019ve described myself as high temperature,\u201d a friend recently told me; in AI-speak, this means he is prone to randomness \u2026
Such speech easily comes off as unsettling, if not aggressively bleak: Why describe beautiful, tender life in detached, algorithmic terms?
Read the full article.<\/a><\/p>\n
Culture Break<\/b>
Reflect. <\/b>What\u2019s happening to the WNBA isn\u2019t normal, Jemele Hill argues. The league\u2019s unprecedented success has come with unprecedented controversy<\/a>.
Read. <\/b>Last year, Sophia Stewart recommended eight books for people who like to dabble in casual pursuits<\/a>. Each read reminds us of the possibilities that lie in our hobbies\u2014even the ones we\u2019re bad at.
Play our daily crossword.<\/a>
PS<\/strong>
A decade ago, my colleague Spencer Kornhaber named FLOTUS<\/i>, <\/i>by the indie-folk group Lambchop, as one of the best albums of 2016<\/a>, likening the band to Bon Iver. Today, Lambchop is out with a gorgeous new record that actually features Bon Iver\u2019s Justin Vernon. Lambchop\u2019s music always has wry humor and good melodies, but I wasn\u2019t prepared for the sumptuous harmonies on Punching the Clown<\/i>. <\/b>The band\u2019s leader, Kurt Wagner, says that he was inspired by a chance hearing on the radio of lined-out singing, a centuries-old practice of church music that migrated from Britain to Appalachia. (For more on the style, read David Ramsey in the Oxford American<\/i><\/a>.) If that seems like an odd basis for an indie record, the results speak\u2014or sing\u2014for themselves.
\u2014 David
Rafaela Jinich contributed to this newsletter.<\/i><\/small>
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting <\/em>The Atlantic.<\/em><\/small>
TheAtlantic.com \u00a9 2026 The Atlantic Monthly Group. All Rights Reserved.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Service<\/a> apply<\/p>\n